BER and SER MATLAB Simulation of Non Square (Rectangular) Constellation QAM [8-QAM] in AWGN Channel

QAM (Quadrature Amplitude Modulation) is widely used in physical digital communication systems, such as WiFi enabled devices, etc. Generally, a square constellation of QAM is preferred, that is because these schemes are easy to Modulate and Demodulate. Any QAM constellation can be considered as a combination PAMs, i.e., both square and rectangular QAM can be thought as a combination of PAMs.
According to a study, End-to-End Energy Modeling and Analysis of Long-Haul Coherent Transmission Systems, the error-rate performance of 8-QAM is close to that of 16-QAM (only about 0.5 dB better), but its data rate is only three-quarters that of 16-QAM. These effects can be seen in the code below, by further extending it to compare with other modulation scheme's BER.

The constellation of the 8-QAM (considering gray mapping) in our scheme looks like. Same result of BER/SER will be obtained if the constellation is 90 Degree rotated about the origin (In the code I have done that).
8-QAM Constellation with Gray Mapping
8-QAM Constellation with Gray Mapping
Then I have derived the theoretical SER expression in terms of Q-Functions, which is given below. (Click to expand the derivation)
Derivation is 8-QAM Probability of Symbol Error
Derivation is 8-QAM Probability of Symbol Error
Now in the MATLAB code (below-bolded) of 8-QAM I have simulated BER and SER curve. Additionally Constellation is also plotted.

clc
clear
close all

nbits=3e7; % No. of bits to be generated
M=8;       % for M-ary modulation scheme
nBitsPerSym = log2(M); % Bits per symbol


% For 8-QAM
map=[-1+3j,-1+1j,-1-3j,-1-1j,1+3j,1+1j,1-3j,1-1j]; % Gray Coded Mapping

figure
plot(real(map),imag(map),'r*');
title('Constellation diagram for Transmitted Symbols');
xlabel('Inphase component');
ylabel('Quadrature component');
axis([-3 3 -3 3]);
sym_map =sqrt(1/6)*map; 
% Normalizing the constellation with its Avg. Symbol Energy
refI = real(sym_map);
refQ = imag(sym_map);

EsN0dB=0:18; % Es/N0 in dB scale
EbN0dB=EsN0dB-10*log10(nBitsPerSym); % Eb/N0 in dB scale

simulatedBER = zeros(1,length(EbN0dB));
theoreticalBER = zeros(1,length(EbN0dB));
theoreticalSER = zeros(1,length(EbN0dB));
symbErrors = zeros(1,length(EbN0dB));
count=1;

for i=EbN0dB

    data_bits=double(rand(1,nbits)>=0.5); 
    % Generating random bits
    inputSymBin=reshape(data_bits,nBitsPerSym,[])'; 
    % Reshaping to form symbol
    b = inputSymBin*(2.^((nBitsPerSym-1):-1:0)).';
    % Converting bits to symbol
    s=sym_map(b+1).'; 
    %M-QAM Constellation mapping through Index Values
 
    EbN0 = 10.^(i/10); %linear scale
    EsN0 = 10.^(EsN0dB(count)/10); %linear scale
    noiseSigma = sqrt(1./(2*nBitsPerSym*EbN0)); 
    %Sigma for AWGN normalised per bit
    n = noiseSigma*(randn(1,length(s))+1i*randn(1,length(s)))';
    y = s + n; % AWGN addition to signal vector
    
    demodSymbols = zeros(1,length(y));
    
    for j=1:length(y)
        [minVal,minindex]=min(sqrt((real(y(j))-refI(1,:)).^2+...
            (imag(y(j))-refQ(1,:)).^2));
        %Finding the minimum Eucledian Distance
        demodSymbols(j)=minindex-1;
    end
    
    symbErrors_t=b.'-demodSymbols;
    symbErrors(count)=sum(symbErrors_t(:)~=0)/(nbits/nBitsPerSym);
    % Simulation SER Calculation
 
    demodBits=dec2bin(demodSymbols)-'0';
    outputSymBin=reshape(demodBits.',1,[])';
    % Symbols to bits
 
    bitErrors=sum(sum(xor(outputSymBin.',data_bits)));
    simulatedBER(count) = bitErrors/nbits;
    % Simulation BER Calculation
 
    theoreticalSER(count)=(5/2)*qfunc(sqrt(EsN0/3))-...
        (3/2)*qfunc(sqrt(EsN0/3))*qfunc(sqrt(EsN0/3)); 
    % Theoritical SER
 
    count=count+1; % Index Update
end

figure;
semilogy(EbN0dB,simulatedBER,'r-*');hold on;
title('BER Vs Eb/N0 (dB) for 8-Ary Modulation');
legend('Simulated');
axis('tight');
grid on;
xlabel('Eb/N0 dB');
ylabel('BER - Bit Error Rate');
grid on;
figure;
semilogy(EsN0dB,symbErrors,'k-o');hold on;
semilogy(EsN0dB,theoreticalSER,'r-*');
title('SER Vs Es/N0 (dB) for 8-Ary Modulation');
legend('Simulated','Theoretical');
grid on;
xlabel('Es/N0 dB');
ylabel('SER - Symbol Error Rate');
grid on;
% Code End

The above code furnishes the results as:
SER vs Es/N0 for 8-QAM modulation scheme (The theoritical and simulation result matched for AWGN channel)
SER vs Es/N0 for 8-QAM modulation scheme (The theoretical and simulation result matched for AWGN channel)
BER vs Eb/N0 for 8-QAM modulation scheme (Only Simulation result for AWGN channel)

An active & prominent author at Digital iVision Labs! Like to write about MATLAB, C++, Arduino, OpenCV, NI Labview, Web Designing & other Electronics stuffs! Finished up M.Tech. From IIIT Delhi, now doing PhD in wireless communication with prominent researchers University College Dublin (CONNECT CENTRE). Drop a mail: vibhutesh[at]gmail.com to ask something about the article or Follow him at....

0 comments: